As someone who beleives in conflict avoidance, inclusive solutions, and above all, remaining in dialogue, even with the most reprehensible individuals, organisations and goverments, the war has been a tricky topic for me. A bit like drug abuse or a blind corner, I don't really think that war can be solved by walking away from it; obviously, it shouldn't be happening, but now that it is, we need to concentrate on minimising harm. So I protest, because war is wrong, but I don't yell troops out! because it's more complicated than that.
Of course that's a very compromised position. I accept that. People who go for slow progress, compromised solutions, and lots of talking to check you're doing the right thing, are never going to be quite as upright and certain as the more idealistic, more principled people.
But it's precisely because you start from that disadvantage you must hold onto your own values. You must never say, they do it so it's ok or it doesn't make any difference in the long term or what does it matter really. You must close your ears to marketeers and businessmen and sociologists who keep saying it's alright everyone does it it's necessary it's expected it's the way it's done.
Harpies, don't listen to them.
I nail my colours to the wall. And in typical compromised way, my colours are muddy, too muddy to explain in depth here.
But they don't include unconditional support for a nation that has not yet adequately disproved the allegation that torture and abuse of human rights are part of standard military practice.